Lawyers · Use case

The firm's legal watch summarised every morning

New statutes, rulings from the supreme courts, updated administrative guidance: an AIOS follows the sources that matter to your practice areas every day, drops what does not concern you, and hands you a short note naming the matters and clients affected.

Legal watch is the piece of work everyone in a firm agrees is essential and nobody has time to do properly. In practice it happens in fits and starts: a newsletter skimmed between two meetings, an alert never opened, a ruling first heard about from another lawyer at the moment it should have been known three weeks earlier. This is not a competence problem, it is an hours problem: legal watch is the only task in a firm that cannot be billed and carries no deadline, so it always comes last.

An AIOS reverses that order. It follows the sources you nominate every day, filtered by your practice areas and, above all, by your live matters. It does not try to cover the whole of legal news: it looks for what actually changes something for this firm. Each morning you get a short note: what was published, what it changes, which matters and which clients are affected, with the citation and the link so you can read the source yourself.

The problem

  • The useful sources are scattered: the official gazette, Legifrance, court portals, administrative guidance, specialist journals, newsletters from other lawyers
  • The volume published on any given day bears almost no relation to the handful of texts that touch your practice areas
  • An important ruling is worth nothing if it is not matched to the live matters it affects at the moment it lands
  • Legal watch ends up as a pile of tabs and PDFs nobody reopens, and the firm learns the news from an opponent or from a client

How the AIOS handles it

It follows your practice areas, not the whole of legal news

You declare what the firm actually handles: employment, commercial leases, family law, business litigation, immigration. The AIOS follows the texts published in the official gazette and on Legifrance every day, the decisions released by the Court of Cassation and the Conseil d'Etat, the published guidance of the authorities relevant to you, plus the journals and briefings the firm subscribes to. A source that has produced nothing useful in three months gets dropped.

It clears the noise and keeps only what changes something

Of everything published on an ordinary day, almost none of it concerns you. The AIOS keeps only what touches your areas and presents it in three lines: what the position was before, what the text or the ruling changes, and from when it applies. The rest never reaches the note, though it stays available if you want to check that nothing slipped through.

It matches every update to your matters and your clients

This is where legal watch turns into useful work rather than reading. A ruling on restrictive covenants gets matched to the employment matters that raise the same point. A statutory instrument that shifts a filing obligation gets matched to the clients in that sector. You receive the update and, underneath it, the list of matters affected and the clients worth warning.

It prepares whatever you will do with it

An update that matters rarely stops at reading: it becomes an internal note to the team, a message to the clients concerned, an item in the firm's newsletter or a post on its LinkedIn page. The AIOS drafts those formats from the same material, in the firm's voice, with the exact citation attached so you can verify it before putting your name to it.

A concrete example

You

This morning's watch, short version.

AIOS

Three items in your areas. First, a statutory instrument published yesterday that pushes a filing obligation back by six months: four of your corporate clients fall within it, and one of them, Tavernier, wrote to you last week to prepare for that very deadline; I have drafted a short message to all four, ready to approve. Second, an employment chamber ruling on the effect of a restrictive covenant where the agreed financial consideration was never paid: two live matters raise exactly that point, Lemoine and Vasseur, and on Lemoine the ruling reads in your favour. The relevant passage is reproduced in the note with a link to the full decision. Third, an update to published tax guidance on a procedural point, with no bearing on any live matter, which I flag briefly because it is a subject you follow. Nothing else today touched your areas.

Other use cases: Triaging the firm's email · Chasing unpaid fees

Main page: Lawyers

Frequently asked questions

Your questions, our answers.

Where do the sources come from, and can they be relied on?

From official public sources (the gazette, Legifrance, the courts' own publication portals) and from the firm's own subscriptions. Every item in the note carries its citation and its link: it never summarises from memory, it summarises a text it has actually read, and you can reach the source in one click. Anything without a verifiable source does not make it into the note.

Does it interpret the law on my behalf?

No. It flags, summarises and cross-references. The precise scope of a decision, whether it transfers to a given matter, and the strategy that follows remain your work and your responsibility. It tells you that a ruling deals with the same point as one of your files; your reading decides whether it applies and what to do about it.

Can associates use it with different practice areas?

Yes. Each lawyer or each team sets their own perimeter and receives their own note, and the firm can also receive a consolidated weekly digest. That is usually the best way in: one team runs it for a few weeks while the choice of sources settles, then it widens to the other areas.

7-day free trial

See it work on your real files.

We set up your first use cases with you during the trial. No credit card, no commitment.

No credit card. No commitment. When the 7 days end, nothing is charged without you.